PDA

View Full Version : U.S. unveils $17.4-billion in emergency auto rescue package



dcaron999
12-19-2008, 10:41 AM
http://m1.2mdn.net/5959/GM_330x60_standard.gif (http://ad.ca.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v8/379b/3/0/%2a/n%3B197057998%3B0-0%3B0%3B13592713%3B1418-330/60%3B25545564/25563421/1%3Bu%3D|site-wwwglobeinvestorcom|zone-robhub|mode-bn|mode2-wbushautos1219|loc-lower|adpg-business-gistory|arena-business|arena-front|ops-|nc-|kw-|pos-lug|sz-330x60|tile-2|%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/multimedia)
Breaking News from The Globe and Mail - The Associated Press and Globe and Mail Update - Friday, December 19, 2008

WASHINGTON — Citing danger to the national economy, the Bush administration came to the rescue of the U.S. auto industry Friday, offering $17.4-billion (U.S.) in emergency loans in exchange for concessions from the deeply troubled carmakers and their workers.
At the same time, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Congress should authorize the use of the second $350-billion from the financial rescue fund that it approved in October to rescue huge financial institutions. Tapping the fund for the auto industry basically exhausts the first half of the $700-billion total, he said.
President George W. Bush said, “Allowing the auto companies to collapse is not a responsible course of action.” Bankruptcy, he said, would deal “an unacceptably painful blow to hardworking Americans” across the economy.
In Canada, the federal and Ontario governments have also pledged a bailout package of their own that would be proportional to Canada's share of the Detroit Three's North American production. Based on Canada's one-fifth share of vehicle production, that would translate into $4.16-billion (Canadian) in short-term, emergency loans.
A spokesman for Ontario Economic Development Minister Micahel Bryant said Friday that Ontario government officials are reviewing President Bush's announcement.
“We've indicated that the U.S. would move first,” he said. “We expect to have more to say in the days to come.”
One official said $13.4-billion of the money would be available this month and next, $9.4-billion for General Motors Corp. and $4-billion for Chrysler LLC. Both companies have said they soon might be unable to pay their bills without federal help. Ford Motor Co. has said it does not need immediate help.
Mr. Bush said the rescue package demanded concessions similar to those outlined in a bailout plan that was approved by the House but rejected by the Senate a week ago. It would give the automakers three months to come up with restructuring plans to become viable companies.
If they fail to produce a plan by March 31, the automakers will be required to repay the loans, which they would find very difficult.
“The time to make hard decisions to become viable is now, or the only option will be bankruptcy,” Mr. Bush said. “The automakers and unions must understand what is at stake and make hard decisions necessary to reform.”
He said the companies' workers should agree to wage and work rules that are competitive with foreign automakers by the end of next year.
And he called for elimination of a “jobs bank” program — negotiated by the United Auto Workers and the companies — under which laid-off workers receive unemployment benefits and supplemental pay from their companies for 48 weeks. If they remain laid off beyond that, they move to a jobs bank in which the company provides about 95 per cent of their pay and benefits. Until the most recent contract, people could remain in the jobs bank for years. Early this month, the UAW agreed to suspend the program.
Mr. Bush's plan is designed to keep the auto industry running in the short term, passing the longer-range problem on to the incoming administration of President-elect Barack Obama.
Mr. Paulson said that with the help for the carmakers, the government will have allocated the first half of the largest government bailout program in history.
He said he was confident that the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have the resources to address a significant market crisis if one should occur before Congress approves the use of the second half of the rescue fund.
Mr. Paulson said he would discuss the process with congressional leaders and Mr. Obama's transition team “in the near future.”
The White House package is the lifeline desperately sought by U.S. automakers, who warned they were running out of money as the economy fell deeper into recession, car loans became scarce and consumers stopped shopping for cars.
The carmakers have announced extended holiday shutdowns. Chrysler is closing all 30 of its North American manufacturing plants for four weeks because of slumping sales; Ford will shut 10 North American assembly plants for an extra week in January, and General Motors will temporarily close 20 factories — many for the entire month of January — to cut vehicle production.
Mr. Bush said the auto manufacturers have faced serious challenges for many years: burdensome costs, a shrinking share of the market and plunging profits. “In recent months, the global financial crisis has made these challenges even more severe,” he said.
The president said that on the one hand, the government has a responsibility not to undermine the private enterprise system, yet on the other hand, it must safeguard the broader health and stability of the U.S. economy.
“If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers,” he said.
“Under ordinary economic circumstances, I would say this is the price that failed companies must pay,” the president said. “And I would not favour intervening to prevent the automakers from going out of business. But these are not ordinary circumstances.
“In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action.”
Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli thanked the administration for its help.
In a statement Friday morning, Mr. Nardelli said the initial injection of capital will help the company get through its cash crisis and help eventually return to profitability. He said Chrysler was committed to meeting the conditions set by Mr. Bush in exchange for the money.
Ford president and CEO Alan Mulally said his company would not seek the short-term financial assistance but predicted the aid would stabilize the industry.
“The U.S. auto industry is highly interdependent, and a failure of one of our competitors would have a ripple effect that could jeopardize millions of jobs and further damage the already weakened U.S. economy,” Mr. Mulally said.
General Motors said the short-term loans would help preserve jobs and “lead to a leaner, stronger General Motors.”
“We know we have much work in front of us to accomplish our plan. It is our intention to continue to be transparent as we execute our plan, and we will provide regular updates on our progress,” the automaker said.
© The Globe and Mail

bmwqc
12-19-2008, 11:39 AM
It was bound to happen. There is no way the govt could allow the 2 companies to go under, not with so many jobs at stake. And then there are the parts suppliers too.

Emre
12-19-2008, 04:37 PM
Why don't GM and Chrysler just build cars that people actually want to buy?

For years they made easy money selling tarted-up pickup trucks with gas-guzzling V8 engines to the public under the rubric of "safety." Everyone was convinced they needed 400 lbs/ft of torque and AWD in a 5000 lbs. ladder-frame platform just so their kids could survive the drive to school.

A little long-term planning would have been nice. Everyone knew that SUVs were dinosaurs facing extinction. Betting the farm on SUVs when the rest of the world had already moved towards smaller, more efficient, less polluting cars was totally irresponsible.

It really pisses me off that our tax dollars are being wasted on this. I can think of a million better ways to spend seventeen and a half billion dollars! This is a final "f*ck you" from GWB.

Gregster
12-19-2008, 05:17 PM
Chrysler did make a car people bought.. it was called the 1st gen Neon. It was light years ahead of the competition and actually turned a very very profit for the company. What killed it? Lack of improvement and a ruined reputation because of penny pinchers that decided to use a cardboard head gasket....

Ford isn't in that bad of a position compared to GM and Chrysler. They are actually going to get their act together by selling some european models here.. but we won't see those until 2010.

There is one fact that people seem to be forgetting.. The evil UAW is what is holding back the big 3.

johnmdanskin
12-19-2008, 05:57 PM
Why don't GM and Chrysler just build cars that people actually want to buy?

For years they made easy money selling tarted-up pickup trucks with gas-guzzling V8 engines to the public under the rubric of "safety." Everyone was convinced they needed 400 lbs/ft of torque and AWD in a 5000 lbs. ladder-frame platform just so their kids could survive the drive to school.

A little long-term planning would have been nice. Everyone knew that SUVs were dinosaurs facing extinction. Betting the farm on SUVs when the rest of the world had already moved towards smaller, more efficient, less polluting cars was totally irresponsible.

It really pisses me off that our tax dollars are being wasted on this. I can think of a million better ways to spend seventeen and a half billion dollars! This is a final "f*ck you" from GWB.

There are a lot of Dodge Chargers out there. The Dodge Caravan is incrediby popular, and also the only minivan in the world with attachments for wheelchairs. It's the only choice for the handicapped.

Corvette has been the best sportscar deal forever.

Ford Fusion, Chevy Cobalt, Dodge Neon: all nice little inexpensive cars with decent mileage.


Did you check out the UAW deal near the bottom of the blurb greg posted? 95% salary forever for UAW workers? Basically, no way to adjust costs when market slows. Crazy.

Gregster
12-19-2008, 06:38 PM
UAW master agreements were signed back in the 30s...

Also the UAW would rather have no jobs rather then taking a pay cut.

bmwqc
12-19-2008, 11:12 PM
My first experience driving a 1st generation Neon was that the car offered plenty of pep and the handling was not bad, although I was never crazy about the so-called "Cab Forward" design (which really meant elongating the dash to make the hood appear shorter, thereby pushing the driver further away from the windshield and creating (the A pillars) a bigger blind spot for the driver when making sharp left turns. My last experience with a Neon was a major disappointment. The car got heavier and the handling got clumsier. Worst still, while the imports (and even the other 2 Big Threes advanced and progressed through the years, the Chrysler product seemed to have taken a step backward in terms of refinement.

The reason why Ford is not in so much of a cash bind is not because their sales are any better, but because when the current CEO came in, he raised over 20 $ billion in (cash for equity). And that money (at least much of it) is still available to the company.

Unionized labour is a real killer. Bottom line is that it means high cost, low incentive & low productivity = slow strangulation. Why are labour costs Honda and Toyota (USA plants) averaging $20 lower per hour than the Big Threes? It all boils down to the pension and the union. To make this govt bailout deal work, the UAW will have to be willing to concede a bit of their position, otherwise it will only be a matter of time when GM, Chrysler and Ford will bite the dust.


Chrysler did make a car people bought.. it was called the 1st gen Neon. It was light years ahead of the competition and actually turned a very very profit for the company. What killed it? Lack of improvement and a ruined reputation because of penny pinchers that decided to use a cardboard head gasket....

Ford isn't in that bad of a position compared to GM and Chrysler. They are actually going to get their act together by selling some european models here.. but we won't see those until 2010.

There is one fact that people seem to be forgetting.. The evil UAW is what is holding back the big 3.